Analgesic effect and safety of using an epidural analgesia pump versus an intravenous analgesia pump for uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of using an epidural analgesia pump versus an intravenous analgesia pump for uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods:Fifty patients with uterine fibroids undergoing uterine artery embolization admitted to The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were included in this study. They were divided into an observation group and a control group ( n = 25/group). Patients in the observation group used an epidural analgesia pump for pain relief, while patients in the control group used an intravenous analgesia pump for pain relief. At 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, pain severity was compared between the two groups using the Visual Analogue Scale. Comfort level was compared between the two groups using the Bruggemann Comfort scale. Before and after surgery, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:At 1 hour after surgery, the Visual Analogue Scale score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [3.00 (2.00, 5.50) vs. 7.00 (6.00, 8.00), Z = -3.84, P < 0.05]. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, there was a significant difference in the Visual Analogue Scale score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Within 24 hours after surgery, the use of opioid analgesics in the observation group was less than that in the control group [16.00% (4/25) vs. 88.00% (22/25), χ2 = 25.96, P < 0.001]. At 1 hour after surgery, the Bruggemann Comfort Scale score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [0.00 (0.00, 0.50) vs. 0.00 (0.00, 0.00), Z = 2.08, P < 0.05]. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, there was no significant difference in the Bruggemann Comfort Scale score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). After surgery, heart rate was significantly decreased in each group compared with before surgery (both P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in respiratory rate and mean arterial pressure between the two groups before and after surgery (both P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and fever between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion:The epidural analgesia pump used for uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids has a better analgesic effect and provides more comfort and is safer than the intravenous analgesia pump. The former is worthy of clinical promotion.

Profiles of adult people in a Spanish sample with chronic pain: Cluster analysis.

AIM: To establish groups of people with chronic non-cancer pain according to the impairment caused by pain and to identify factors associated with the group with a higher level of impairment. BACKGROUND: Knowing the profiles of people who suffer from chronic non-cancer pain could make it possible to direct their treatment and to detect associated risks. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: A sample of 395 people with chronic non-cancer pain was collected in Pain Units and Primary Healthcare Centres in southern Spain (January to March 2020). A cluster analysis was performed to divide the population into groups and a binary logistic regression model was established to determine factors associated with the group with a higher level of impairment. RESULTS: Two groups were identified: lower level of impairment due to pain, characterized by being 45-65 years old, not medicated with opioids or anxiolytics, employed and with a mild level of impact on daily life; and higher level of impairment characterized by being older than 65 years old, medicated with opioids and anxiolytics, retired or on medical leave and with a severe impact on daily life. In addition, among women, being widowed, single or a smoker are risk factors for belonging to the group with a higher level of impairment; being smokers or consuming alcohol three or less times a week would be risk factors in men. CONCLUSIONS: Age, chronic non-cancer pain impact on daily life, work situation and the consumption of opioid drugs and/or anxiolytics are factors that appear to influence the level of impairment due to chronic pain. IMPACT: These findings could help detect impairment due to pain in its early stages, determining the specific needs of each person.

Incidence of persistent postpartum opioid use by mode of delivery: a 2016 cohort study of Danish women.

BACKGROUND: The use of oral opioids as standard treatment after cesarean delivery has been linked to persistent use in opioid-naïve women in the USA. In Denmark, the use of opioids after cesarean delivery is typically restricted to in-hospital use. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of persistent postpartum opioid use in Denmark and compare the incidence by mode of delivery. METHODS: This was a national cohort study of all women giving birth in Denmark in 2016, with one-year follow-up. Data from Danish registries were retrieved and combined using each woman's unique identification number. Persistent use of opioids was defined as ≥3 redeemed opioid prescriptions 31-365 days postpartum. RESULTS: A total of 62 520 births were included in the cohort: 49 859 vaginal deliveries, 5310 intrapartum cesarean deliveries, and 7351 pre-labor cesarean deliveries. For all births, persistent postpartum opioid use occurred in 85 (140 in 100 000) women of whom 36 (42%) had opioid use during pregnancy. The incidence of persistent opioid use was highest in the pre-labor cesarean delivery cohort (n=27; 360 in 100 000) and lowest in the intrapartum cesarean delivery cohort (n=3, 60 in 100 000; P<0.001). Women taking opioids during pregnancy were at increased risk of persistent opioid use (odds ratio 63.3; 95% CI 43.9 to 91.4). CONCLUSIONS: Women giving birth in Denmark, where use of post-discharge opioid treatment is generally restricted, have a low risk of developing persistent use of opioids, with very few women seeking additional analgesic treatment from their general practitioner.

Trends in healthcare expenditures and resource utilization among a nationally representative population with opioids in the United States: a serial cross-sectional study, 2008 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on healthcare costs and expenditures associated with populations prescribed an opioid primarily focused on populations who chronically use opioids or have opioid use disorder. However, studies that characterize the healthcare and expenditures costs among the wider number of people prescribed opioids in a nationally representative population are unavailable. We sought to characterize the healthcare costs and expenditures associated with a population prescribed an opioid in the U.S. from 2008 to 2017. METHODS: A serial cross-sectional design was used to compare the economic burden of adult household respondents who were prescribed and not prescribed an opioid using pooled data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) between 2008 and 2017. Respondents with an opioid prescription were matched to respondents without an opioid prescription using propensity score match methods with survey weights. Two-part generalized linear models were used to estimate the survey-weighted annual healthcare expenditures and resource utilization adjusting for multiple covariates. Additionally, 10-year trend comparisons between the groups were performed. Costs were adjusted to 2019 US dollars. RESULTS: There was a weighted total of 31,696,671 respondents with an opioid and 31,536,639 respondents without an opioid after propensity score matching. The sample had a mean (SD) age of 50.63 years (18.03), 58.9% females, and 81.6% Whites. Total annual economic burden among RPOs was $524 billion. Annual total expenditures per respondent with and without an opioid were $16,542 and $7067, respectively (P < 0.001). Similarly, adjusted prescription, outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient expenditures were significantly higher for respondents with an opioid compared to respondents without an opioid. Average annual increases in expenditures were significantly greater among respondents with an opioid compared to respondents without an opioid for total (+$185; 95% CI: $37-$334) and prescription (+$78; 95% CI: $28-$128) expenditures. There were no differences in the average annual trends for outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient expenditures between respondents with and without an opioid. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents with an opioid prescription had higher healthcare expenditures and resource utilization compared to respondents without an opioid prescription from 2008 to 2017. Specifically, significant annual increases were observed for total and prescription expenditures. Additionally, 10-year trends in total and prescription expenditures were higher among respondents with an opioid than respondents without an opioid.

Estudio comparativo de las visitas a urgencias por intoxicaciones por opiáceos en dos periodos / Comparative study of visits to Hospital Emergency Department for opioid overdose in two periods

Objetivo: El uso de fármacos opioides ha aumentado en las últimas décadas, así como las intoxicaciones relacionadas con su uso. El objetivo de esteestudio es evaluar el número de visitas a urgencias en un hospital universitariopor intoxicaciones por opiáceos entre dos periodos y analizar las posiblesdiferencias de las características de los pacientes, perfil de prescripción y eltratamiento de dicha intoxicación.Método: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo de las visitas debidas aintoxicaciones por fármacos opiáceos en dos periodos: 2009-2014 y2018-2020.Resultados: Se incluyeron 47 casos de intoxicaciones, 20 en el primer periodo (3,3 casos/año) y 27 en el segundo (9 casos/año). Seobservó una disminución en la edad de los pacientes (81,1 versus 74,0;p = 0,044) y un incremento de tratamientos debidos a dolor traumatológico agudo a expensas de menos tratamientos de dolor crónico(p = 0,002). No hubo diferencias en el opiáceo implicado. Con respectoa la clínica, se observó una disminución en los síndromes confusionales(p = 0,026) y un incremento de fallecimientos.Conclusiones: Las visitas a urgencias por intoxicaciones a fármacosopiáceos han aumentado en los últimos años, así como la mortalidadasociada. El perfil de los pacientes implicados ha variado, incrementándose el tratamiento de dolor traumatológico agudo. (AU)

Objective: The last few years have seen an increase in the use of opioidanalgesics and in the incidence of opioid overdoses. The objective of thisstudy was to evaluate the number of overdose-related visits to a universityhospital emergency department at two different periods of time to analyzepotential differences in terms of patient characteristics, prescription profile,and treatment.Method: This is a retrospective observational study of opioid overdoserelated visits in two periods of time: 2009-2014 and 2018-2020.Results: The study included 47 cases of opioid overdoses: 20 during thefirst period (3.3 cases/year) and 27 during the second (9 cases/year). Acomparison between the two period showed a decrease in the patients’age (81.1 vs 74.0; p = 0.044) and an increase in the number of acutetrauma-derived pain treatments at the expense of chronic pain treatments(p = 0.002). No differences were observed in the opioids involved. Asregards symptoms, there was a decrease in the incidence of confusionalsyndromes (p = 0.026) and an increase in deaths.Conclusions: Emergency room visits for opioid overdoses have increased in recent years, as has the mortality associated to them. A changehas also been observed in the profile of affected patients, with a highernumber of cases where pain is derived from acute trauma. (AU)

Risk of opioid abuse in non-oncologic chronic pain outpatient clinic / Risco de abuso de opioides em ambulatório de dor crônica não oncológica

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain has become an extremely prevalent disease and an ever more recurrent reason for seeking medical attention. It has been treated with opioids, opening the possibility for abuse. This study's objective was to analyze the risk profile for opioid abuse in chronic pain outpatients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 72 patients seen in an outpatient clinic of a public hospital in the period of July and August 2019. The variables analyzed were age, gender, comorbidities, drugs in use, and aspects related to pain such as intensity, anatomical location, etiology, and need to be absent from work. In addition, a questionnaire was applied to assess the risk of opioid abuse. RESULTS: The study analyzed 72 patients with chronic pain, most of whom were women (84.7%). The mean age was 52.8 years. Patients were classified into three groups according to the risk of opioid abuse: high (21%), moderate (29%) and low (50%). There was an association of increased risk with opioid use (p=0.004) and presence of depression (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Half of the patients presented low risk for opioid abuse. Increased risk for opioid abuse is related to the presence of depression or depressive symptoms. No relationship was observed between benzodiazepines use and increased risk for opioid abuse. Patients considered at high risk for opioid abuse are more likely to develop aberrant behaviors. Knowing the patient's risk profile is necessary to increase the safety and effectiveness of chronic pain treatment.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor crônica tem se tornado uma doença extremamente prevalente e um motivo cada vez mais recorrente para procura de atendimento médico. Tem sido tratada com opioides possibilitando o abuso de seu uso. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o perfil de risco para abuso de opioides em pacientes ambulatoriais com dor crônica. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com 72 pacientes atendidos em ambulatório de um hospital público no período de julho e agosto de 2019. As variáveis analisadas foram idade, sexo, comorbidades, fármacos em uso e aspectos relacionados à dor como intensidade, localização anatômica, etiologia e necessidade de se afastar do trabalho. Além disso, foi aplicado um questionário para avaliar o risco de abuso de opioides. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados 72 pacientes com dor crônica, sendo a maioria mulheres (84,7%). A média de idade foi de 52,8 anos. Os pacientes foram classificados em três grupos conforme o risco de abuso de opioides: alto (21%), moderado (29%) e baixo (50%). Houve associação do aumento do risco com o uso de opioides (p=0,004) e com a presença de depressão (p=0,003). CONCLUSÃO: Metade dos pacientes apresentou baixo risco para abuso de opioides. O aumento do risco de abuso de opioides está relacionado à presença de depressão ou sintomas depressivos. Não foi observada relação entre o uso de benzodiazepínico e o aumento no risco de abuso para opioides. Pacientes considerados de alto risco para abuso de opioides têm mais chances de desenvolverem comportamentos aberrantes. É preciso conhecer o perfil de risco do paciente para aumentar a segurança e eficácia do tratamento da dor crônica.

Pain management in the emergency department: a clinical review.

Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to visit the emergency department. The ever-growing research on emergency department analgesia has challenged the current practices with respect to the optimal analgesic regimen for acute musculoskeletal pain, safe and judicious opioid prescribing, appropriate utilization of non-opioid therapeutics, and non-pharmacological treatment modalities. This clinical review is set to provide evidence-based answers to these challenging questions.

Kidney Function Modifies the Effect of Intraoperative Opioid Dosage on Postoperative Delirium.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies demonstrating how kidney function affects the risk of developing delirium in older adult surgical patients administered opioids. This study determined whether baseline kidney function influences the relationship between morphine equivalent dose and the development of delirium on postoperative day (POD) 2 in patients with hip fracture. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed emergency department (ED) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), perioperative serum creatinine, intravenous morphine equivalents, and POD2 delirium assessment by the Confusion Assessment Method in 652 patients aged 65 years or older without preoperative delirium. ED eGFR was used to divide subjects into groups by presence or absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and associations of opioid dose with POD2 delirium were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: POD2 delirium incidence was 29.8% (N = 194). Intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) morphine equivalent dosage as well as ED eGFR were similar comparing patients with and without POD2 delirium. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and dementia were associated with delirium on POD2. The odds of POD2 delirium increased significantly with increase of intraoperative opioid in patients with CKD (odds ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.2-2.2), but not in patients without CKD (P-interaction = .04). PACU or POD1 opioid doses were not associated with POD2 delirium after covariate adjustment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that incremental increases in intraoperative opioids combined with CKD increase odds of POD2 delirium after hip fracture repair, compared with patients without CKD.

Fertility treatment and oral contraceptive discontinuation for identification of pregnancy planning in routinely collected health data - an application to analgesic and antibiotic utilisation.

BACKGROUND: Women with unplanned pregnancies use folic acid less frequently, and more often use potentially teratogenic medications in the first trimester. Yet most studies based on routinely collected data lack information on pregnancy planning. Further, only pregnancies proceeding beyond a certain gestational age appear in routinely collected data, creating the possibility for collider-stratification bias. If pregnancy intention could be identified, pregnancies could be ascertained earlier. This study aimed to investigate fertility treatment and discontinuation of oral contraception (OC) as proxies for pregnancy planning by describing variations in patterns of prescription fills for antibiotics and analgesics during the peri-pregnancy period by these proxies of pregnancy intention. METHODS: Fertility treatment with clomiphene and discontinuation of OC were identified in the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) and linked with data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway for the years 2006 to 2017. Filled prescriptions for antibiotics and analgesics from NorPD were displayed for women on fertility treatment, women who discontinued OC before pregnancy, and women who discontinued during pregnancy. RESULTS: Of 172,585 included pregnancies, fertility treatment was identified in 19,449, and OC discontinuation before or during pregnancy in 153,136. Women who discontinued OC during pregnancy were less likely to use preconception folic acid (25.4%) than women who discontinued before pregnancy (32.9%), and women on fertility treatment (51.0%). Proportions of first trimester prescription fills were 4.9% (analgesics) and 12.8% (antibiotics) for women who discontinued OC during pregnancy, compared to 4.0 and 11.4% in women who discontinued OC before pregnancy, and 4.7 and 11.0% in women on fertility treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There were no substantial differences in patterns of prescription fills for analgesics and antibiotics before or during pregnancy by fertility treatment and OC discontinuation. This suggests that there were few differences in medication use between women with planned and unplanned pregnancies, or that fertility treatment and timing of OC discontinuation from routinely collected health data cannot stand alone in the identification of unplanned pregnancies. A narrower definition of OC discontinuation during pregnancy seemed to be a better proxy, but this should be confirmed in other studies.

[Pharmacotherapy of chronic neuropathic pain]. / Pharmakologische Therapie chronischer neuropathischer Schmerzen.

Chronic neuropathic pain has a prevalence of 6.9-10% in the general population. The current recommendations for treatment are presented based on a literature search. Neuropathic pain requires the use of co-analgesic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant drugs and topical agents because non-opioid analgesic drugs are usually ineffective. The use of meta-analyses tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin-norephinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and calcium channel anticonvulsants are recommended as the drugs of first choice. Under certain conditions chronic neuropathic pain can be treated with opioids. Topical therapeutics are only used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. At present the use of drugs is independent of the etiology of the pain. Comorbidities, concomitant medication, potential side effects and patients' age have to be considered in treatment planning.

Opioid Treatment and Excessive Alcohol Consumption Are Associated With Esophagogastric Junction Disorders

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influence of external factors such as opioids and alcohol has been extensively investigated for various segments of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the association between their use and the development of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction disorders (EGJOODs) is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze prevalence and clinical relevance of opioids and alcohol intake in patients with EGJOODs. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed clinical and pharmacological data of 375 consecutive patients who had undergone high resolution impedance manometry for EGJOODs. EGJOODs were classified according to the Chicago classification version 3.0 and to recently published normal values for test meals. Demographics, manometric data, and symptoms were compared between different groups using Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariate analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: EGJOOD was found in 30.7% (115/375) of all analyzed patients. The prevalence of opioids (14.8% vs 4.2%, P = 0.026) was significantly higher in patients with EGJOODs compared to patients without EGJOODs. Additionally, excessive alcohol consumption (12.2% vs 3.5%, P = 0.011) was associated with EGJOODs. Excessive alcohol consumption was especially frequent in the non-achalasia esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction subgroup (16.2%) and opioid use in the achalasia type III subgroup (20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant association between EGJOODs and opioid as well as excessive alcohol consumption. This underlines the importance of detailed history taking regarding medication and ethanol consumption in patients with dysphagia. Further prospective studies on mechanisms undelaying esophagogastric junction dysfunction due to opioids or alcohol are warranted.

Fluoroscopic Characterization of Colonic Dysmotility Associated to Opioid and Cannabinoid Agonists in Conscious Rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastrointestinal adverse effects have a major impact on health and quality of life in analgesics users. Non-invasive methods to study gastrointestinal motility are of high interest. Fluoroscopy has been previously used to study gastrointestinal motility in small experimental animals, but they were generally anesthetized and anesthesia itself may alter motility. In this study, our aim is to determine, in conscious rats, the effect of increasing doses of 2 opioid (morphine and loperamide) and 1 cannabinoid (WIN 55,212-2) agonists on colonic motility using fluoroscopic recordings and spatio-temporal maps. METHODS: Male Wistar rats received barium sulfate intragastrically, 20–22 hours before fluoroscopy, so that stained fecal pellets could be seen at the time of recording. Animals received an intraperitoneal administration of morphine, loperamide, or WIN 55,212-2 (at 0.1, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) or their corresponding vehicles (saline, Cremophor, and Tocrisolve, respectively), 30 minutes before fluoroscopy. Rats were conscious and placed within movement-restrainers for the length of fluoroscopic recordings (120 seconds). Spatio-temporal maps were built, and different parameters were analyzed from the fluoroscopic recordings in a blinded fashion to evaluate colonic propulsion of endogenous fecal pellets. RESULTS: The analgesic drugs inhibited propulsion of endogenous fecal pellets in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy allows studying colonic propulsion of endogenous fecal pellets in conscious rats. Our method may be applied to the noninvasive study of the effect of different drug treatments and pathologies.

Reducing Opioid Prescribing Rates in Emergency Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Pain management is one of the most common reasons patients visit the emergency department. Understanding the contributions of emergency medicine-and specifically Ochsner Health System's emergency providers-to the opioid crisis is important. Benchmark prescribing data indicated that Ochsner Health System emergency medicine providers' opioid prescription rates were significantly higher than the national average in emergency medicine. METHODS: Data relevant to visit and opioid prescription counts were extracted from the organization's electronic health record system. Opioid prescription rates were calculated for each provider. A data transparency project was initiated in which provider opioid prescription rates were unblinded and distributed among the provider group. RESULTS: Opioid prescription rates declined in aggregate for the emergency services from 22% to 14% during the 1-year project timeline. Some physicians demonstrated a 70% reduction in prescription rates. Importantly, patient satisfaction scores were not negatively impacted by declining opioid prescription rates. CONCLUSION: Provider performance transparency using unblinded and transparent data analytics can efficiently and significantly alter provider practice.

Association Among Opioid Use, Treatment Preferences, and Perceptions of Physician Treatment Recommendations in Patients With Neck and Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between self-reported use of opioids by patients with neck and back pain and their demographics, pain characteristics, treatment preferences, and recollections of their physicians' opinions regarding treatment options. METHODS: We analyzed 2017 Gallup Poll survey data from 1680 US adults who had substantial spine pain in the past year and used logistic regression to explore the aforementioned relationships. RESULTS: Our multiple regression analysis indicated that adults with neck or back pain severe enough to have sought health care within the last year were more likely to have used opioids in the last year if they (in descending order of marginal impact) had pain that had lasted 1 year or less (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 34.35, 90% confidence interval [CI] 17.56-74.32); concurrently used benzodiazepines (OR = 6.02, 90% CI 2.95-12.33); had Medicaid as an insurance source (OR = 3.29, 90% CI 1.40-7.48); indicated that they preferred to use pain medications prescribed by a doctor to treat physical pain (OR = 3.24, 90% CI 1.88-5.60); or were not college educated (OR = 1.83, 90% CI 1.05-3.25). Compared with patients aged 65 years and older, those aged 18 to 34 years were less likely to have used opioids in the past year (OR = 0.09, 90% CI 0.01-0.40, 0.50 for 95% CI). Respondents' perceptions of medical doctors' positive or negative opinions regarding a variety of neck and back pain treatment options were not significantly associated with opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neck and back pain who use opioids differ from those who do not use opioids in that they are more likely to have pain that is of shorter duration, to use benzodiazepines, to have Medicaid as an insurance source, and to prefer to use pain medications. Those characteristics should be considered when developing opioid use prevention strategies.

Recurrent Desaturation Events due to Opioid-Induced Chest Wall Rigidity after Low Dose Fentanyl Administration / 대한구급학회지

Opioid-induced chest wall rigidity is an uncommon complication of opioids. Because of this, it is often difficult to make a differential diagnosis in a mechanically ventilated patient who experiences increased airway pressure and difficulty with ventilation. A 76-year-old female patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for periprosthetic fracture of the femur neck. On completion of the surgery, airway pressure was increased, and oxygen saturation fell below 95% after a bolus dose of fentanyl. After ICU admission, the same event recurred. Manual ventilation was immediately started, and a muscle relaxant relieved the symptoms. There was no sign or symptom suggesting airway obstruction or asthma on physical examination. Early recognition and treatment should be made in a mechanically ventilated patient experiencing increased airway pressure in order to prevent further deterioration.

Recurrent Desaturation Events due to Opioid-Induced Chest Wall Rigidity after Low Dose Fentanyl Administration / 대한중환자의학회지

Opioid-induced chest wall rigidity is an uncommon complication of opioids. Because of this, it is often difficult to make a differential diagnosis in a mechanically ventilated patient who experiences increased airway pressure and difficulty with ventilation. A 76-year-old female patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for periprosthetic fracture of the femur neck. On completion of the surgery, airway pressure was increased, and oxygen saturation fell below 95% after a bolus dose of fentanyl. After ICU admission, the same event recurred. Manual ventilation was immediately started, and a muscle relaxant relieved the symptoms. There was no sign or symptom suggesting airway obstruction or asthma on physical examination. Early recognition and treatment should be made in a mechanically ventilated patient experiencing increased airway pressure in order to prevent further deterioration.

Effects of parecoxib on analgesia benefit and blood loss following open prostatectomy: a multicentre randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This multi-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test the hypotheses that parecoxib improves patients' postoperative analgesia without increasing surgical blood loss following radical open prostatectomy. METHODS: 105 patients (64 ± 7 years old) were randomized to receive either parecoxib or placebo with concurrent morphine patient controlled analgesia. Cumulative opioid consumption (primary objective) and the overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS), the modified brief pain inventory short form (m-BPI-sf), the opioid-related symptom distress scale (OR-SDS), and perioperative blood loss (secondary objectives) were assessed. RESULTS: In each group 48 patients received the study medication for 48 hours postoperatively. Parecoxib significantly reduced cumulative opioid consumption by 24% (43 ± 24.1 mg versus 57 ± 28 mg, mean ± SD, p=0.02), translating into improved benefit of analgesia (OBAS: 2(0/4) versus 3(1/5.25), p=0.01), pain severity (m-BPI-sf: 1(1/2) versus 2(2/3), p < 0.01) and pain interference (m-BPI-sf: 1(0/1) versus 1(1/3), p=0.001), as well as reduced opioid-related side effects (OR-SDS score: 0.3(0.075/0.51) versus 0.4(0.2/0.83), p=0.03). Blood loss was significantly higher at 24 hours following surgery in the parecoxib group (4.3 g⋅dL(-1) (3.6/4.9) versus (3.2 g⋅dL(-1) (2.4/4.95), p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following major abdominal surgery, parecoxib significantly improves patients' perceived analgesia. Parecoxib may however increase perioperative blood loss. Further trials are needed to evaluate the effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on blood loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00346268.

A survey of cancer pain management among hospitalized elderly patients / 中华全科医师杂志

To explore the status of cancer pain management among hospitalized elderly patients.Pain intensity,use of analgesic drugs and incidence of adverse reactions were surveyed for 620 cancer pain patients.And 218 of them were aged over 65 years.The proportions of mild,moderate and severe pain were 29.8％,36.2％ and 34.0％ respectively.And the corresponding rates in young and middle-aged patients were 28.4％,34.8％ and 36.8％ respectively (P ＞ 0.05).In elders with cancer pain,28％ used no analgesic.For severe pain patients,only 71.6％ received potent opioids and 5.4％ nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.And the corresponding rates in young and middle-aged patients were 26.1％,73.0％ and 4.7％ respectively (P ＞ 0.05).The rates of constipation,dysuria and delirium in elderly patient group were higher than young and middle-aged patient group (P ＜ 0.05).Pain management is unsatisfactory and rational uses of analgesic drugs should be strengthened for preventing the relevant adverse reactions.

Influence of intensive care treatment on the protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone during pain therapy in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate the effect of intensive care treatment on the protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative analgesia using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study; of which, 49 completed the study (age range 40-81 yr). Sufentanil was administered as an analgesic intraoperatively, and hydromorphone was dosed after operation with TCI and PCA until 8 a.m. on the first postoperative day. Arterial plasma samples were collected for drug and protein concentration measurements up to 24 h after cardiac surgery. Corresponding patient data were collected from the electronic patient data system. After explorative data analysis with principal component analysis, multivariate regression analysis and non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to study the effect of treatment on protein binding. RESULTS: Data of 35 patients were analysed. The median protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone was 88.4% (IQ range 85.7-90.5%) and 11.6% (IQ range 9.5-14.3%), respectively. Free fraction of sufentanil increased towards the end of the study period, whereas hydromorphone free fraction remained nearly constant. The total sufentanil concentration and volume balance were identified as significant covariates for the protein binding of sufentanil. For the protein binding of hydromorphone, no significant covariate effects were found. CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil protein binding was significantly dependent on changes in the total drug concentration and volume balance addressing the importance of adequate dosing and fluid-guided therapy. Hydromorphone protein binding was nearly constant throughout the study period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2011-003648-31 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01490268.

[Breakthrough pain treatment with sublingual fentanyl in patients with chronic cutaneous ulcers]. / Tratamiento del dolor irruptivo con fentanilo sublingual en pacientes con úlceras cutáneas crónicas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of opioids in the management of pain in those patients with chronic cutaneous ulcers and breakthrough/incidental pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An open-label, multicentre, prospective, uncontrolled study was conducted in the pain and ulcer units of 5 hospitals across the Comunidad Valenciana. Eligibility criteria were baseline pain 4 in the visual analogue scale or breakthrough procedural pain 4. Exclusion criteria were cognitive impairment, opioid intolerance, or patient refusal to provide informed consent. The protocol scheduled 5 controls: baseline (enrolment), 15 days, one month, 2 months, and 3 months. The main outcome measure of the study was the visual analogue scale score during rest, movement and procedures. Opioids were administered for release of the baseline pain, and sublingual fentanyl for breakthrough pain. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (86.5%) completed the study. Baseline pain achieved a mean improvement of 3.6 visual analogue scale points (SD 2.3), movement pain improved by 3.9 points (SD 2.5) and procedural pain improved by 4.5 points (SD 2.8), and the mean pain intensity improvement was statistically significant from the first control and at all controls thereafter (P<.001). Nausea was reported by 14 patients (43.8%), drowsiness and constipation by 7 (21.9%), itching by 5 (15.6%), and one (3.1%) reported vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Structured assessment of pain is a key concept in the management of patient with chronic cutaneous ulcers. The results of this study suggest that opioid therapy provides clinically significant pain relief with few adverse effects.